TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART A
1. Introduction
2. Cases dealt with by the ICD
3. Particulars of matters reported to the ICD
4. Applications for exemption
5. Consolidated returns
6. Readiness of SAPS to implement the DVA
6.1 North West
6.2 Limpopo
6.3 Northern Cape
7. Cases where the complainants subsequently withdrew the
complaints
8. Conclusion
9. Annexures:
Annexure A – DVA 1
Annexure B – DVA 2
Annexure C – DVA 3
PART B
Report on the 16 days of activism of no
violence against women: 25 November 10 December 2001
1. INTRODUCTION
In terms of s18 (5)(c) of the Domestic
Violence Act 116 of 1998 (DVA) the ICD must every six months, submit a report to
Parliament regarding the number and particulars of matters reported to it in terms of s18
(4) (a), setting out the recommendations made in respect of such matters.
However, during the year 2001, we suffered
the sudden and tragic death of one of our stalwarts, Mr. Steve Tiro. Mr. Tiro was tasked
to compile this report but unfortunately because of his death, it was not possible for us
to table the report biannually as prescribed by the Act. This report thus covers the
period from January to December 2001.
We wish to humbly apologize for this late
tabling and commit ourselves to timeous tabling of these reports in future.
In terms of the ICD Policy for Monitoring
of the Implementation of the DVA by the SAPS, matters dealt with are divided into three
categories:
(i) Applications for exemption by the
SAPS (DVA1)
In terms of the DVA and National
Instructions 20778, such an application will be made by the commander of a police member
who has not complied with his / her obligations in terms of the DVA. The ICD will then
make a decision as to whether to grant the exemption from prosecution of the member.
(ii) Cases reported directly to the
ICD (DVA2)
These are cases reported directly
to the ICD by the public. This category is also divided into three subcategories, viz:
- Cases where domestic violence complaints have not been reported to the police first;
- Complaints of statutory non-compliance by
the SAPS which have already been complained of to the SAPS;
- Complaints of statutory non-compliance by
the SAPS which have not been brought to the attention of the SAPS.
- Cases which fall under this category
(DVA2) are generally referred to the SAPS for investigation, and the ICD would monitor
them.
(iii) Cases where disciplinary
proceedings have been instituted (DVA3)
These are cases in which there was a
failure by a member of the SAPS to comply with an obligation imposed in terms of the DVA
and the necessary disciplinary proceedings were instituted by the SAPS against such
member. In respect of such cases the ICD does not have to make recommendations in terms of
the DVA, but to monitor the progress of the cases. However, the SAPS seem to be labouring
under the assumption that the ICD has to make recommendations in respect of all the cases
reported to it. In terms of the DVA, the ICD only makes recommendations in cases where a
member has applied for exemption from prosecution as mentioned above.
2. CASES DEALT WITH
BY THE ICD
(Figure. A) DVA1 CASES
| PROVINCIAL OFFICE |
NUMBER OF CASES |
| Gauteng |
0 |
| Limpopo |
0 |
| Mpumalanga |
0 |
| North West |
0 |
| Free State |
0 |
| KwaZulu Natal |
1 |
| Limpopo |
0 |
| Western Cape |
2 |
| Eastern Cape |
0 |
| TOTAL |
3 |
(Figure. B) DVA2 CASES
| PROVINCIAL OFFICE |
NUMBER OF CASES |
| Gauteng |
59 |
| Limpopo |
12 |
| Mpumalanga |
5 |
| North West |
2 |
| Free State |
1 |
| KwaZulu Natal |
11 |
| Northern Cape |
0 |
| Western Cape |
48 |
| Eastern Cape |
8 |
| TOTAL |
146 |
(Figure. C) DVA3 CASES
| PROVINCIAL OFFFICE |
NUMBER OF CASES |
| Gauteng |
21 |
| Limpopo |
0 |
| Mpumalanga |
1 |
| North West |
2 |
| Free State |
3 |
| KwaZulu Natal |
3 |
| Northern Cape |
0 |
| Western Cape |
30 |
| Eastern Cape |
13 |
| TOTAL |
73 |
Total number of DVA1 cases = 3
- 1 case pending
- 2 finalised
Total number of DVA2 cases = 146
- 114 cases pending
- 2 cases withdrawn
- 15 cases finalised
- 15 cases closed
Total number of DVA3 cases = 73
- 53 cases pending
- 1 case withdrawn
- 6 cases finalised
- 13 cases closed
The overall number of DVA cases dealt
with by the ICD was two hundred and twenty two (222)
3. PARTICULARS
OF MATTERS REPORTED TO THE ICD
The ICD is still experiencing an increase
in the number of complaints being reported to it directly, by both the public and the
SAPS. This may be attributed to the communitys awareness of the DVA, the duties it
imposes on the SAPS and the action taken by SAPS against members who do not comply with it
(See Annexures A, B and C for details). However, the position is somewhat different in the
North West Province, Northern Cape and Limpopo. Our office in the Northern Cape has never
dealt with any domestic violence cases reported to it directly (DVA2) since the
promulgation of the DVA. We have raised our concern in this regard in our previous report,
and seemingly the communities in these provinces are still ignorant of their rights as
conferred by the DVA.
4. APPLICATIONS FOR
EXEMPTION
We have so far only received three
applications for exemption. One application was received from the South Port police
station in KwaZulu Natal. The other two applications were received from Hout Bay and
Ashton police stations respectively in the Western Cape. We have finalized these
applications.
5. CONSOLIDATED
RETURNS RECEIVED FROM SAPS
Not all ICD Provincial Offices have
received consolidated returns from the SAPS in terms of clause 14 (3) of the National
Instructions. Despite having been in contact with the SAPS in this regard, none have been
forthcoming.
Clause 14(4) of the National Instructions
stipulates that where disciplinary proceedings against a member have not been completed,
the return of the subsequent month must again contain particulars concerning the
complaint. This clause is still not being complied with even though it was highlighted in
our previous reports to Parliament. It is difficult to monitor the progress of matters
reported to us by the SAPS due to this non-compliance.
A total number of 19 cases are still
pending and most of them have been pending for a long time. This can only mean that no
real progress has been made by the SAPS in finalising these cases. Every effort should be
made to speedily resolve these cases, otherwise victims of domestic violence will lose
confidence in the system that is currently in place to help them.
In Mpumalanga, our office received
consolidated returns directly from the police stations instead of through the Provincial
Commissioners office as stipulated in the National Instructions. This obviates the
cumbersome procedure of having to go through all the structures before the ICD could
receive the returns it has alleviated the bureaucratic bottleneck.
In Gauteng, some police stations would deal
with complaints received and finalize them without submitting applications for exemption.
As a result of this, the cases are left open with the hope that applications will be
submitted and be recorded accordingly. This contributes to the pending status of some
cases reported to the ICD.
5.1 The ICD
Provincial Offices that have received consolidated returns from the SAPS are:
- Gauteng
- Free State
- KwaZulu Natal
- Western Cape
- Eastern Cape
- North West
5.2 The ICD Provincial Office that
has received nil returns is:
5.3 The ICD Provincial Offices still
awaiting consolidated returns for 2001 are:
6. READINESS OF SAPS TO IMPLEMENT THE DVA
In terms of the DVA, the ICD is obliged to monitor its implementation by the SAPS. During the period covered by this report, we had an opportunity to visit police stations in the North West, Northern Cape and Limpopo to observe their readiness to implement the DVA.
6.1 In the North West Province the following police stations readiness was observed during May 2001:
- SAPS Mmabatho
- SAPS Mafikeng
- SAPS Lomanyaneng
- SAPS Madibogo
- SAPS Atamelang
- SAPS Itsoseng
- SAPS Lichtenburg
- SAPS Zeerust
- SAPS Lehurutshe
- SAPS Motswedi
Findings:
- Not all stations have SAPS 508 registers.
- Most of the police stations do not have a specific unit dealing with domestic violence cases nor specific officers handling such cases.
- The stations are not user-friendly, and domestic violence complainants are attended to at the Community Service Centre (CSC). It is only the Mafikeng police station which has a trauma centre.
- The lack of shelters for abused women in the surrounding areas of all stations visited is one of the major problems which the police have to deal with when handling domestic violence cases.
- Best practices were recorded at the Mmabatho police station. This station has a unit which deals specifically with domestic violence complaints, and it is staffed by four members of which two are always on standby. The only problem that hinders the work of the unit is lack of transport, which makes it impossible for them to respond to complaints timeously.
6.2 In the Limpopo
Province the Mara police station was visited on 01 February 2001.
We found that the station maintains a
proper SAPS 508 register and the Station Commissioner peruses it on a daily basis.
However, there was a note in the register that members should always record the complaints
and that the register had not been used for about two months. This note created the
impression that not all cases of domestic violence were being recorded.
6.3 In the Northern Cape the
following stations were observed during May 2001:
- SAPS Modderrivier
- SAPS Sunrise
- SAPS Philliptown
- SAPS Grobblershoop
- SAPS Colesburg
- SAPS Fraserburg
- SAPS Galeshewe
- SAPS Hartswater
- SAPS Windsorton
- SAPS Hopetown
Findings:
- Most of these police stations are not ready to implement the DVA.
- Not all the stations have SAPS 508 registers, and as a result it is difficult to keep track of cases.
- In most police stations, domestic
violence complaints are attended to by male officers and this makes it difficult for
female victims to be completely open with these officers. Rape victims are also forced to
narrate their experiences to male officers who are not even trained on issues around
gender sensitivity. In some of the stations female officers do not work night shift even
though the staff complement does seem to allow the working of such a shift. As a result
victims of domestic violence and those of rape are subjected to secondary victimisation.
- Basically there are not enough female
officers performing operational duties at the aforementioned police stations. For example,
at Windsorton police station there are no female officers who can attend to rape victims
and domestic violence cases. The male officers have to take the victims to Barkley West,
which is 40km away from the station, to get assistance from female officers.
- Some of the police stations such as
Fraserburg do not operate at night, and therefore, victims of domestic violence in their
respective jurisdictions cannot obtain assistance at night.
- In other stations, victims of domestic
violence are assisted by male police officers because female officers work during the day
only.
7. CASES WHERE THE
COMPLAINANTS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDREW THE COMPLAINTS
In cases where complainants
withdraw their complaints against members of the SAPS and it is already evident that they
have contravened the DVA and the National Instructions, it is not clear whether the ICD
should continue to ensure that the offenders are brought to book, or whether the charges
should indeed be withdrawn. This kind of problem would be much simpler to deal with if the
ICD had power in terms of the Act to influence the decision one way or the other. For
example, a case against a member stationed at Villeria police station was withdrawn solely
on the basis that the complainant failed to attend the court proceedings. However, where
it appears that the complainant has been unduly influenced to withdraw the charge, the ICD
must and will intervene.
8. CONCLUSION
The volume of complaints received
by the ICD somewhat reflects that communities are gradually becoming aware of the rights
conferred by the DVA on victims of domestic violence. However, this does not mean that we
should stop educating the communities in this regard. We are still experiencing problems
in Limpopo, Mpumalanga and Northern Cape where we do not receive consolidated returns from
the SAPS at all and are receiving a lesser volume of complaints reported directly to us,
unlike in other provinces. For example, when observing the readiness of police stations in
the Northern Cape in implementing the DVA, we found that some domestic violence cases are
improperly registered as Assault GBH cases. It was therefore difficult to track the cases
and to determine the problem areas of domestic violence in the province.
In-depth training is still required for the
SAPS to understand the social complexity of domestic violence, and also to effectively and
efficiently handle domestic violence cases. Station Commissioners must ensure that their
members are familiar with the DVA and the National Instructions, and they must also
compile Station Regulations. The question of lack of resources (like motor vehicles) is
still a problem, which needs to be addressed since it contributes to inefficient service
delivery by the SAPS.
A vigorous awareness campaign is required
especially in the aforementioned problematic provinces to ensure that the public is aware
of its rights in terms of the DVA, and also to assist SAPS in its implementation since
they are the first port of call for victims of domestic violence.
The ICD continues to be committed to
co-operating with the SAPS in order to ensure efficient service delivery to the
communities we serve.
Adv KD McKenzie
Executive Director
Independent Complaints Directorate
Annexure A
INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS DIRECTORATE
DVA 1 CASES
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
KwaZulu Natal
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| South Port |
Failure to register a complaint |
Recommended that the exemption be
granted and members be offered training on DVA |
Recommendations implemented |
Finalised |
Western Cape
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Hout Bay |
Failure
to assist the complainant by neglecting to ensure her safety as prescribed by the Act. |
The
ICD found that the members involved were not in breach of the National Instructions but
they ensured the safety of the complainant and she was allowed to remove her items from
the house. The ICD recommended that the members be exempted from disciplinary proceedings. |
The
SAPS concurred with the ICDs decision and thus no disciplinary steps were
instituted. |
Finalised |
| Ashton |
Failure to assist
the complainant to retrieve house keys from the respondent after he had told her to leave
the shared premises. |
Recommended that
disciplinary proceedings be instituted against the member. |
Disciplinary hearing
pending. |
Pending |
Annexure B
INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS DIRECTORATE
DVA 2 CASES
CASES REPORTED DIRECTLY TO THE ICD
Gauteng Province
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Pretoria West |
Negligence of duties
- failure to register a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Area Commissioner referred the
matter to the Provincial Commissioner |
Pending (awaiting
correspondence from the Provincial Commissioner) |
| Lenasia South |
Failure to effect an
arrest after violation of a Protection Order |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Victim refuses to cooperate with
the police |
| Lenasia South |
Failure to effect an
arrest after a breach of Protection Order |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Atteridgeville |
Negligence of duties-
failure to assist complainant to register a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Mamelodi |
Negligence of duties
- failure to assist complainant to register a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Mamelodi |
Contravention of DVA
& Part 13 of National Instructions |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Kempton Park |
Failure to execute a
warrant of arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Area Commissioner referred
application for exemption to Provincial Commissioner |
Pending |
| Vosloorus |
Contravention of DVA
& Part 13 of National Instructions |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Vosloorus |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a case of assault |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Vosloorus |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Vosloorus |
Failure to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Hillbrow |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Alexandra |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Sandringham |
Assault |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Soshanguve |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Thokoza |
Failure to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Thokoza |
Negligence of duties - failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Moroka |
Breach of Protection Order |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Sandton |
Negligence of duties - failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Naledi |
Failure to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Naledi |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Kliptown |
Negligence of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Crystal Park |
Failure to effect arrest on breach of interdict |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Katlehong |
Negligence of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Etwatwa |
Negligence of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Etwatwa |
Negligence of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Jabulani |
Negligence of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Protea
Glen |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Primrose |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Primrose |
Failure
to assist the complainant to open a case |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Sasolburg |
Failure
to assist the complainant to open a case |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Moroka |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Roodepoort |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Mamelodi |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Atteridgeville |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Katlehong |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Primrose |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Kagiso |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS. ICD considers the case open and is currently addressing the matter with SAPS
management. |
Case closed without
applying for an exemption |
Pending |
| Lenasia |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Diepkloof |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Roodepoort |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Application for
exemption is still pending |
Pending |
| Hillbrow |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Case withdrawn and
closed |
Finalised |
| Katlehong |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 04/12/2001 |
No response from the
SAPS |
Pending |
| Vosloorus |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 31/11/2001 |
No response from the
SAPS |
Pending |
| Eldorado
Park |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 31/11/2001 |
It was discovered
that a wrong Protection Order was issued and as such it could not be enforced |
Dismissed |
| Thokoza |
Failure
to effect an arrest on breach of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 28/11/2001 |
No response from the
SAPS |
Pending |
| Lenasia |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 06/12/2001 |
No response from the
SAPS |
Pending |
| Soshanguve |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 05/12/2001 |
No response from the
SAPS |
Pending |
| Kliptown |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Kempton
Park |
Failure
to execute a warrant of arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Atteridgeville |
Failure
to effect an arrest on a breach of Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 14/12/2001 |
No response by the
SAPS |
Pending |
| Etwatwa |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Thokoza |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
The case was
withdrawn by the complainant |
Withdrawn |
| Mamelodi |
Failure
to assist complainant by not taking her to a place of safety |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 12/12/2001 |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Katlehong |
Failure
to effect arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Crystal
Park |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 03/12/2001 |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Atteridgeville |
Failure
to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS. A reminder dispatched on 04/12/2001 |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Moroka |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Moroka |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Case closed by the
SAPS without applying for an exemption |
Pending |
| Ennerdale |
Failure
to arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
Western Cape
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Atlantis |
Violation
of a Protection Order |
The complainant is untraceable and as such the matter has been closed as
undetected |
Complainant cannot be
traced |
Closed |
| Atlantis |
Rape, Sodomy and violation of Protection Order |
The ICD
monitored this matter |
The suspect was
arrested and thereafter the complainant withdrew the case |
Closed |
| Atlantis |
Assault,
Harassment and verbal abuse |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Assistance was
rendered to the complainant and was advised to obtain a Protection Order |
Closed |
| Kuilsriver |
Failure
to effect an arrest on violation of a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
The arrest was
effected and the officer who had failed to enforce the order was given training on DVA |
Finalised |
| Kuilsriver |
Failure
to effect an arrest and to assist the complainant to register a complaint |
Matter
referred to SAPS with a recommendation that the officers implicated be charged for
non-compliance |
Members were charged
departmentally and date for hearing is still pending |
Pending |
| Grassy Park |
Failure to effect an
arrest on violation of Protection Order |
Matter was referred to
SAPS |
Clearly explained to the
complainant that there has not been a breach of Protection Order |
Finalised |
| Grassy Park |
Failure to effect an
arrest on breach of Protection Order |
Matter referred to
SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Manenberg |
Failure to assist the
complainant to retrieve his clothes from the shared household |
Matter referred to
SAPS |
Disciplinary steps were taken and
a verbal warning given against the offending member. |
Closed |
| Manenberg |
Failure to effect an
arrest on breach of a Protection Order and counter-Protection Order |
Matter referred to
Clerk of the court due to invalid documents |
The matter was not referred to
SAPS |
Closed |
| Mitchells Plain |
Failure to effect an
arrest on violation of Protection Order and assault |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under investigation |
Pending |
| Mitchells
Plain |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Investigation
finalised |
Withdrawn
by the complainant |
| Mitchells
Plain |
Failure
to effect an arrest on breach of Protection Order. |
Complainant
was informed that the police acted in compliance with the DVA |
Matter never referred
to SAPS |
Finalised |
| Mitchells
Plain |
Failure
to protect the complainant at the scene and to assist her to retrieve her belongings |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Awaiting
SAPS response |
| Nyanga |
Failure
to effect an arrest on breach of Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Complainant not
contactable |
Finalised |
| Nyanga |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Paarl-East |
Breach of
Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Ceres |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Complainant not
contactable |
Finalised |
| De Aar |
Assault |
It was
established that the complainant did not have a Protection Order, she was advised to
return to court |
The matter was never
referred to SAPS |
Closed |
| Diep River |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
The complaint was
unfounded |
Finalised |
| Diep River |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
It was
established that the police indeed assisted the complainant |
The matter was never
referred to SAPS |
Closed |
| Bellville |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
SAPS requested the
original copy of the Protection Order from the complainant |
Awaiting
SAPS response |
| Goodwood |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter is still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Phillipi
East |
Assault
and failure to enforce a Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter is still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Phillipi
& Mitchells Plain |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
The SAPS are
currently investigating said complaint. |
Pending |
| Plettenberg
Bay |
Failure
to serve a Protection Order and discourteous treatment of the complainant |
The ICD is
monitoring the complaint |
The SAPS are
currently investigating said complaint. |
Pending |
| Delft |
Failure
to return a Protection Order to the complainant |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
After the ICDs
intervention the complainants Protection Order was returned to her. It was in fact
found that the Protection Order had been returned to the courts. |
Closed |
| Delft |
Failure
to effect an arrest on breach of Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter sill under
investigation |
Pending |
| Cape Town
Central |
Discourteous
treatment |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Khayelitsha |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
SAPS arrested the
respondent |
Finalised |
| Khayelitsha |
Abuse of
power and failure to effect an arrest |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
SAPS arrested the
respondent |
Closed |
| Khayelitsha |
Unlawful
arrest |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Complainant was
released |
Finalised |
| Steenberg |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order and discourteous treatment |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Case withdrawn |
Closed |
| Steenberg |
Breach of
a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
The SAPS
investigation revealed that the respondent only took his personal belongings |
Finalised |
| Table View |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter received
attention, but complainant later chose to withdraw the said case |
Closed |
| Unknown |
Failure
to assist the complainant- the respondent released on bail |
ICD
advised the complainant that the police acted in compliance with the DVA |
Matter never referred
to SAPS |
Finalised |
| Unknown |
Failure
to assist the complainant to remove her husband from their house |
Referred
to Clerk of the court |
Matter never referred
to SAPS |
Closed |
| Manenberg |
Failure
to assist complainant to retrieve his belongings from the shared household |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
The SAPS assisted
complainant in accordance with the Protection Order |
Finalised |
| Kleinvlei |
Failure
to effect an arrest after a Protection Order was breached |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Warrant of arrest
executed |
Finalised |
| Mitchells
Plain |
Failure
to serve a Protection Order and to assist the complainant to retrieve her belongings from
the shared household |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter is still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Mitchells
Plain |
Complainants
husband was arrested on breach of a Protection Order and sentenced to four months
imprisonment with four/five years suspended sentence. Complainant was distressed since she
was unsure whether in fact he would receive bail |
Complainant
was interviewed and explained that the decision of the magistrate was outside the mandate
of the ICD. It was, however, found thereafter that he would not be granted bail |
Warrant of arrest
executed |
Finalised |
| Elsies
River |
Failure
to enforce a Protection Order |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Guguletu |
Failure
to assist the complainant to retrieve her belongings from the shared household |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter under
investigation |
Pending |
| Kasselsvlei |
Failure
to effect an arrest after a Protection Order was breached |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter under
investigation |
Pending |
| Langa |
Failure
to effect an arrest after a Protection Order was breached |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
Matter under
investigation |
Pending |
| Kensington |
Failure
to effect an arrest after a Protection Order was breached |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
SAPS investigated the
matter |
Disciplinary
measures pending |
| Delft |
Failure
to return a Protection Order to the complainant |
Matter
referred to SAPS |
After the ICDs
intervention the complainants Protection Order was returned to her. It was in fact
found that the Protection Order had been returned to the courts. |
Closed |
Eastern Cape
| POLICE
STATION |
NATURE
OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
Louis Le
Grange
(P.E) |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Umtata |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Assistance was
rendered to the complainant |
Closed |
| E. L
Gonubie |
Emotional
Abuse |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Cofimvaba |
Emotional
Abuse |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Beacon Bay |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Swartkops |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Nu 13 |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Investigation
finalised (assistance was rendered to the complainant) |
Closed |
| Mooiplaas |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
Mpumalanga
| POLICE
STATION |
NATURE
OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Dennilton |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Awaiting
SAPS response |
| Witbank |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Referred to court |
Closed |
| Nelspruit |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
SAPS requested
original copies of Protection Order and warrant of arrest from the complainant of which
she could not provide same |
Closed |
| Middleburg |
Failure
to ensure safety of the victim |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Matsulu |
Violation
of a Protection Order |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
Kwa-Zulu Natal
| POLICE
STATION |
NATURE
OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Lamontville |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Greenwood
Park |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Lamontville |
Unprofessional
investigation |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Greenwood
Park |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Sydenham |
Failure
to serve a Protection Order |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Brighton
Beach |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Umlazi |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Cato Manor |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Phoenix |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Isipingo |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Point |
Failure
to serve a Protection Order |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
Limpopo Province
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE
OF COMPLAINT |
ICD
ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Lebowakgomo |
Failure
to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Disciplinary steps
against Station Commissioner and the Inspector could not be considered |
Finalised |
| Seshego |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Complainant was
assisted |
Finalised |
| Seshego |
Negligence
of duties- failed to arrest the perpetrator after violating the Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Complainant was
assisted |
Finalised |
| Mankweng |
Negligence
of duties failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Awaiting
SAPS response |
| Bandelierkop |
Negligence
of duties failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Awaiting
SAPS response |
| Lebowakgomo |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Awaiting
SAPS response |
| Seshego |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
ICD
perused the docket as a result of the complaint |
SAPS investigated the
case and the suspect released on warning |
Case
closed- suspect released on warning |
| Mankweng |
Negligence
of duties- failure to effect an arrest |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Bandelierkop |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Magatle |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Polokwane |
Breach of
Protection Order |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
| Lebowakgomo |
Failure
to assist complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
Free State
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE
OF COMPLAINT |
ICD
ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Virginia |
Failure
to assist the complainant to lodge a complaint |
Referred
to SAPS |
Matter still under
investigation |
Pending |
North West
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
ICD ACTION |
SAPS ACTION |
STATUS |
| Letlhabile |
Unsatisfactory investigation |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter under investigation |
Pending |
| Mmabatho |
Negligence of duties- failure to
effect an arrest |
Referred to SAPS |
Matter under investigation |
Pending |
Annexure C
INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS DIRECTORATE
DVA 3 CASES
CASES WHERE DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED BY SAPS
Gauteng Province
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| Ennerdale |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Eldoradopark |
Failure to execute warrant of
arrest |
N/A |
Pending |
| Lenasia |
Failure to enforce a Protection
Order |
19/02/01 |
Disciplinary officer declined to
prosecute |
| Lenasia South |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Lenasia |
Failure to enforce Protection
Order |
N/A |
Pending |
| Pretoria West |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Pretoria Central |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Pretoria Central |
Failure to comply with the
National Instructions |
N/A |
Pending |
| Springs |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Springs |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Springs |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Brooklyn |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Brooklyn |
Failure to comply with the
National Instructions |
N/A |
Pending |
| Kliptown |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Kliptown |
Failure to assist the complainant
to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Sophiatown |
Negligence of duties to lodge a
complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Sophiatown |
Members did not
charge the suspect after he was arrested |
10/01/2002 |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Brixton |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4C (Reg 18[21] Not
guilty) |
| Brixton |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4C (Reg 18[21] Not
guilty |
| Brixton |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4C (Reg 18[21] Not
guilty |
| Brixton |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4C (Reg 18[21] Not
guilty |
Free State
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF
COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| Parkroad Detective
Services |
Member neglected her
duties by failing to act at the scene of crime |
N/A |
Charges withdrawn |
| Sasolburg |
Members failed to
arrest the suspect (SAPS member) |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Maokeng |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Finalised (Member
fined) |
Western Cape
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF
COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| Parow |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Parow |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) |
| TBH |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS1 (Members to
receive training on how to handle domestic violence cases) |
| Grassy Park |
Negligence of duties |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Steenberg |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) Closed |
| Pacaltsdorp |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) Closed |
| Pacaltsdorp |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2-(Verbal warning) Closed |
| Pacaltsdorp |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) Closed |
| Bishop Lavis |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) Closed |
| Kuilsriver |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) |
| Kuilsriver |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Pending |
| Kuilsriver |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) |
| Hout Bay |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Pinelands |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
04/12/01 |
DS2 (Verbal Warning) |
| Ashton |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Matter still under
investigation |
| Paarl East |
Failure to obtain
statement and register a case |
N/A |
Pending |
| Claremont |
Corruption and
defeating the ends of justice |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Hout Bay |
Failure to assist
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Kuilsriver |
Common assault |
14/06/2001 |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Somerset West |
Failure to enforce a
Protection Order |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Kuilsriver |
Assault common |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Beaufort-West |
Assault common |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Oudtshoorn |
Assault common |
07/08/2001 |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress |
| De Rust |
Assault common |
N/A |
Case referred to DPP
for decision |
| Beaufort-West |
Assault common |
N/A |
DPP has decided to
prosecute. Date to be finalized |
| De Rust |
Assault common |
N/A |
Awaiting DPPs
decision |
| Parow |
Member opened a wrong
complaint |
N/A |
DS1 Verbal
Warning |
| Macassar |
Pointing of fire-arm |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
| Pinelands |
Failure to record
incident in the DVA register |
N/A |
DS1 Verbal warning |
| Hout Bay |
Failure to assist
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Investigation
still in progress) |
KwaZulu Natal
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF
COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| South Port |
Failure to serve
Protection Order |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| South Port |
Failure to serve
Protection Order |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| South Port |
Failure to serve
Protection Order |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
North West
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF
COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| Atamelang |
Failure to comply
with the DVA |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Bathlaros |
Failure to comply
with the DVA |
N/A |
DS2 (Verbal warning) |
Eastern Cape
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF
COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| Port Elizabeth |
Failure to effect an
arrest |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Louis Le Grange
Square |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Graaff-Reinet |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Cradock |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Cradock |
Failure to effect an
arrest |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Bethelsdorp |
Failure to effect an
arrest |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Bethelsdorp |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Walmer |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Walmer |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Walmer |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4A (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Tsolo |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4 (Matter still
under departmental investigation) |
| Umtata |
Failure to assist the
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4 (Matter still
under investigation) |
| King Williams Town |
Failure to assist
complainant to lodge a complaint |
N/A |
DS4 (Matter still
under investigation |
MPUMALANGA
| POLICE STATION |
NATURE OF COMPLAINT |
DATE OF HEARING |
STATUS |
| Middleburg |
Failure to assist complainant to
lodge a complaint |
N/A |
Application for exemption still
pending |
Annexure D
REPORT
ON THE SIXTEEN DAYS OF ACTIVISM FOR NO VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN: 25 NOVEMBER
10 DECEMBER 2001
A. INTRODUCTION
Our approach this year was of a proactive
nature wherein we targeted vulnerable communities in rural areas, farm workers and those
living in informal settlements.
B. OBJECTIVE
The main objective of visiting the said
communities was to create awareness on the role of the ICD in the implementation of the
Domestic Violence Act, (hereinafter referred to as DVA or the Act) and also to sensitize
people to break the silence on abuse against women and children.
We also conducted police station audits
aimed at assessing the SAPS readiness in the implementation of the Act. This activity was
minimal as a result of a National Instruction issued by the National Commissioner of SAPS
barring the ICD from visiting police cells and auditing police registers, in the absence
of a formal investigation.
C. METHODOLOGY
Our modus operandi entailed
identifying vulnerable communities and thereafter setting up appointments for awareness
campaigns in certain communities. Some of our campaigns were conducted in partnership with
the Gauteng Department for Safety and Liaison whereby the MEC and the Executive Director
addressed those communities.
Posters and brochures outlining information
on the general mandate of the ICD and its role in terms of the Act were distributed.
D. PROGRAMME OF ACTION
1. ROAD SHOW IN MAMELODI: 30 November 2001
The Gauteng Safety and Liaison Department
in conjunction with SAPS Mamelodi and the CPF invited the ICD to participate in a road
show which culminated in an awareness and information session and the community was
addressed by the Director of Research and Development where brochures on the ICD and DVA
were distributed among the community. Short speeches were also given at each and every
stop station.
2. ZEEKOEIGAT: 1 December 2001
Zeekoeiegat is a farming area situated on
the Moloto Road next to Kameeldrift police station. This area is dominated by farm workers
who are migrant workers. The level of literacy in this area is very low and as such the
rate of violence perpetrated against women and children is said to be high. In some cases,
men were also found to be victims of domestic violence.
Our visit uncovered that the said community
was not aware of the DVA, let alone the role of the ICD in terms of the DVA. We addressed
the farm workers on our mandate and the DVA. We were referred to some of those who had
been victims and could not find help. Allegations were that the police did not record
their domestic violence complaints and most victims were advised by the police to go back
home to address their problems without the polices intervention. The complainants
could not be traced at the time of the campaign but we requested their neighbours and
friends to inform them about the ICD and to contact us for further assistance.
We distributed brochures in all the
relevant languages, on the DVA and ICD and also put up posters entailing ICD addresses and
contact numbers.
3. ROAD SHOW IN ATTERIDGEVILLE: 02 December
2001
The abovementioned road show was also
organized by Gauteng Safety and Liaison. The road show culminated in a rally which was
addressed by the MEC, Ms Nomvula Mokonyane, the Executive Director of the ICD, Adv Karen
McKenzie, representatives from the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development,
Local Councillors, NICRO and the local CPF. The audience consisted of children, men and
women as well as elderly people.
Speeches presented were mainly based on the
DVA and the duties of other role-players in the Act. People were encouraged to break the
silence on all sorts of abusive practices. They were further advised on how to assist
victims and who to call if victimized or after witnessing domestic violence. After the
session, the audience was issued with brochures and posters on DVA and other
organizations, which play pivotal roles in eradicating gender based violence.
4. SOSHANGUVE COMMUNITY RADIO STATION: 04
December 2001
Our presentation on the Soshanguve Radio
Station was conducted in conjunction with SAPS Soshanguve and Garankuwa. We shared a slot
and we received many questions on our role regarding the DVA. There were also questions
based on our role in the transformation of the SAPS and our mandate in general. From the
questions that were asked, it was clear that most people do not know the rights of
individuals in terms of the DVA, the duties of the police as well as the mandate of the
ICD.
The allocated slot was 45 minutes but it
overlapped to an hour as a result of the influx of calls from listeners. Most listeners
went to the extent of requesting that we should come back for more presentations on our
role in terms of the Domestic Violence Act.
5. TEMBA: 05 December 2001
Our presentation at Temba was conducted at
the Local Government offices and the audience comprised of members of the local
authorities and NGOs. There was a clear indication of the fact that there is a high number
of complaints pertaining to domestic violence and further that the police were reluctant
to intervene when requested to. The role of the ICD was not known and there was a plea
that there should be a much more intensive community outreach programme by ourselves.
We were also requested to form a
partnership with the local authorities and local NGOs in order to access communities.
6. MAUBANE VILLAGE: 08 December 2001
Maubane Village is situated on the old
Pietersburg road next to the Carousel Casino. This presentation was the highlight of our
campaign. The arrangement was done in partnership with the Local Ward Councillor, who
extended invitations to the Tribal Authority and the neighboring villages.
The audience comprised of the elderly, the
youth, women and children. It culminated with a road show around the Maubane village. The
road show was attended by approximately 500 people.
The Executive Director of the ICD, Advocate
Karen Mckenzie and the Provincial Head of the ICD North West, Mr. Matthew Sesoko, made
presentations about the DVA, the role of the ICD in terms of the Act and our overall
mandate as well as the guidelines as to how to deal with victims of domestic violence.
There was also a presentation by Advocate
Molly Malete, the Managing Director of Pelotshwana Consultants whose main business
is to assist victims of domestic violence with counselling as well as assisting such
victims in applications for Maintenance Orders and Protection Orders.
E. PROVINCIAL ACTIVITIES
Our provincial offices were also
engaged in a number of activities, which were done in partnership with our stakeholders.
Our Gauteng Office was invited to attend public meetings in the Vaal area, East
Rand and Soweto. The representatives gave short speeches on our overall mandate and our
role in terms of the DVA. Brochures and other publicity materials were distributed in
those meetings.
The North West Office in conjunction
with the Standing Committee on Safety and Liaison and the SAPS visited the Kgomotso
community. This was subsequent to complaints received by both the SAPS management and the
ICD regarding the service of the local police station. The community had gathered to voice
their frustration about the station. The SAPS management (Area Commissioner),
representatives of the Standing Committee and the ICD were given a platform to make a
presentation on their respective roles and mandate. It was uncovered that the police
officers serving in that station did not know their actual role in terms of the Act and
did not receive any training in the DVA. It was subsequently addressed with the Provincial
Commissioner and he committed himself to conducting an audit on training regarding the
DVA.
In Mpumalanga the ICD attended a
provincial rally held at Delmas. The main speaker was the Honourable Premier Mahlangu.
This office visited SAPS Matsulu, Barberton, Kanyamazane and Nelspruit. The aim of the
visit was to inspect the readiness of the SAPS to implement the Act.
Our Free State Office addressed
people who attended a march organized by the Bolokanang Women Support group in Petrusburg.
They marched to the local police station where a memorandum was handed to the Acting
Station Commissioner and the local Chief Magistrate. The march was attended by
approximately 200 people and the ICD made a presentation on its mandate and its role with
regard to the DVA. They also attended a "Breakfast for Men" organized by the
Commission on Gender Equality where the men committed themselves to eradicate violence
against women and children. Donations were made to victims of violence as part of the
commitment. The Commission for Gender Equality organized a Gender Dialogue where the ICD
formed part of the panel who unpacked the DVA to an audience of approximately 250 people
who had attended the event.
Our Limpopo Office also attended a
number of events organized by other government departments.
The Western Cape Office conducted
police station audits aimed at assessing the SAPS readiness to implement the Act. Five
stations were visited, namely, Mitchells Plain, Khayelitsha, Paarl-East, Cloetesville,
Grassy Park and the following problems were encountered regarding the implementation of
the Domestic Violence Act:
- Certain stations do not have Domestic Violence Registers and a list of agencies, as required in terms of the DVA.
- Complaints of Domestic Violence are handled in the same manner as other criminal cases.
- The implementation of the Domestic Violence Act at certain stations only commenced in April 2001.
- Most stations experience problems with human and material resources e.g. vehicles, safe houses, etc.
- Stations are not submitting statistics of
disciplinary steps taken against members for non-compliance as per the National
Instructions and DVA.
- Not all incidents of domestic violence
are being recorded.
- The time periods taken to attend to
scenes are problematic because of other priority cases and/or shortage of
personnel/vehicles.
It is important that continuous training be
offered to members dealing with domestic violence cases. Shortage of vehicles also
contributes to the lengthy periods taken to attend to complaints, which could possibly be
detrimental to complainants. There also exists a shortage of personnel. It is important
that directives be kept in vehicles (in accordance with the SAPS National Instructions).
Generally the main problems contributing to domestic violence, in these areas, seems to be
unemployment and substance abuse.
F. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the ICD had initially
planned to visit the 20 priority stations which had received the highest number of cases
pertaining to violent crimes against women and children, however, there was a National
Instruction issued by the National Commissioner of Police precluding the ICD from auditing
registers and other specific issues within police stations. This instruction gave Station
Commissioners the authority to preclude the ICD from attending at police stations to
execute on its mandate.
There are still police officers who have
not received training on the DVA. This was discovered through audits conducted in the
North West and Western Cape. Against this background, it is obvious that it is possible
that the problem could be prevailing in many police stations hence we still do not receive
consolidated returns from certain areas. For as long as the SAPS management continues to
preclude the ICD from assisting in identifying the weaknesses at certain stations,
civilians will continue to receive poor and insensitive service from untrained members.
On the positive side, our modus operandi
has identified a number of issues, which will help the ICD to continue nourishing the good
relationship we have established by reaching out to vulnerable communities. People who did
not know of the existence of the ICD, let alone its mandate are now fully aware that they
are able to lodge a complaint against the police. The overall support we got was
overwhelming and most of the communities we visited actually pleaded with us to revisit
them for the purpose of conducting awareness and information sessions. |